To Feed the Mind and Nourish the Soul

The superhero wound up reading the conclusion of A Tale of Despereaux with the younger two, and I’m not quite sure how it ended.   They both seemed a bit underwhelmed—hmmm.      They’ve picked up through Mom’s intentional role modeling to see a movie only after they’ve read the book.     Though this wasn’t one of my favorites, I’m curious as to whether the same exact story and character development exists in the movie.

 

 As I’m sinking my teeth into Carol Jago’s books on the value of classics for all children, I’ve been thinking a lot about what makes a good book, well, a good book.    With all due respect to the Newberry Honors committee, I’ve determined that a book that receives honors isn’t, in and of itself, a good selection for me.   Though I liked Despereaux’s tale, I have to admit my annoyance with what seems to be a recurring theme in some literary works: children that are sorely abused and/or neglected.     I remember during one of our first years of homeschooling, we read The Water Babies.   I’d never heard of the book, but I’m always intrigued with a unique title.    The fantasy of this book was amazing; I can still remember some of the images of the little hero’s travels and transformation from a chimney sweep’s apprentice to an angelic type of merman.    Sadly, what I remember most is how he was always grimy, dirty, hungry  and neglected.   Maybe it’s my sensitivity as a mom, but I couldn’t help but reflect on this sad little boy as we met Despereaux’s Miggery Sow.  (Does the movie include her?   I wonder).

 

What makes me want to read a book again, and again, and again?   I’ve decided that it’s not the fact that it’s listed as a classic.    Over the years I’ve read a number of classics, thinking, “Who decided that this book is worth the first read, much less a revisit?”   (Again, my apologies to those who live and die by classics lists).    Again, early in my homeschooling journey, I had a conversation with a more seasoned homeschooling mom about a book that the oldest, then about 9, was really struggling to read—from the perspective of interest, not ability.   It was killing me to listen, and putting her to sleep to read.    But it’s a classic, I lamented to this dear soul, whom I now consider a mentor and friend—what should I do?    This resulted in an interesting conversation about the fact that it’s okay for a book that’s considered to be a classic to others to be a sleeper for you.   She spoke of books that she’d read with her son where the climax didn’t happen until the end of the book.   She was very helpful in sharing techniques to keep longer, more difficult books interesting.    You’d think some of this conversation would be intuitively obvious, but then again, when you take teaching into your own hands, some of the mental flips you agonize over can be mind-boggling if you tried to articulate it to someone.   I struggled so much with the “have tos” of school then (and sometimes now)—it’s almost embarrassing.

 

I figured it out while reading Ms. Jago’s pleas for teachers to consider reading classics not just to the honors students and those well-heeled enough to afford private education.   I want books that feed the mind and nourish the soul.   I want the kids to be exposed to books that force them to think about who they are and make changes for the better.   I want them to chew on the lessons that a book has to offer—not just in the moment, but for years to come.    When I think about the best experiences we’ve had with books, some were rare and precious:  we cheered, we laughed until we cried; at least once, I did cry.    But those emotions didn’t always occur.    What did happen—and it might not have manifested itself until later—is that the words were shaping the children’s thinking.    If God’s Word sets this precedent, why shouldn’t we fully expect other books that are worth our attention to do the same?    

Advertisements

3 comments on “To Feed the Mind and Nourish the Soul

  1. karen0317 says:

    I understand your take on this topic. I decided this year that literature would be purely for pleasure. Like art and poetry, some pieces speak to me in a way that may not speak to another person. I don't test on literature. I found that the girls really enjoy lit now more than before. I provide a tried and true list of books (mostly classical in nature) and let them choose the ones that sound most interesting to them. For example, I'll give Rachel a list of 12 books and tell her that she needs to read "so many" by the end of the semester. I didn't read many classics as a kid, so I appreciate almost all of the ones I read with them. I'm just happy to see them seek them out for themselves. I recall Rachel choosing Pride and Prejudice… I think it was last year. She enjoyed it so much, she wanted to read all of Jane Austen's books! Not knowing about the content of the others, I didn't allow her to, but encouraged her to try out others from my list and she may like them just as well.

    Long story short… I want them to find their own personal "classics". They seem to be heading that way. 🙂

  2. 4sweetums says:

    Well said! We have found some classics that are real keepers and some books that are not considered classics. I too, get tired of the constant neglect of kids found in more recent titles. I am not sure what that says socially but it is worth chewing on the reason.
    Blessings,
    Dawn

  3. Haflingerhorses says:

    A very good post – I'd love to see a list of books that you think fits this description of what a good book is. ((I'm with you all the way on "classics")).

    Antoinette

Your two cents, please!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s